Agrofood chains: a viable alternative for sustainable rural development or consolidation of big business?

  • María Rosa Yumbla
Keywords: agro-food chains, global industrial food systems, value chains, contract farming, consumer, agribusiness, market power

Abstract

Beginning in the 90s, following patterns that responded to the global corporate food regime, the government of Ecuador encouraged the formation of agro-food chains, among them, the chain of corn-animal feed- poultry. The food chain includes two service links (SL) and four productive links (PL) controlled by companies such as Pronaca, Agripac, Ecuaquímica and Supermaxi. These companies implemented horizontal, vertical, financial, and brand integrations, as strategies to consolidate market power and something even more prejudicial –the shaping of decisions regarding what and how to plant, and the available choices of what and how to consume– progressively creating a gap between producers and consumers.

This model promotes corn monoculture through contract farming, encourages the use of agrochemicals, and endorses large poultry and swine processing factories which cause air, soil and water pollution from the ‘by products’, gas, feces and urine produced by the animals. Additionally, it promotes, supports an increases the consumption of animal protein, which is energy inefficient.

The article discusses the consolidation of the agro-food chain, corn –processed food– poultry, and their links in order to determine if the integration of producers and consumers in this chain is an alternative to equitable development. Or are they part of the business strategies that respond to global food systems?

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Published
2013-11-16
How to Cite
Yumbla, María. 2013. “Agrofood Chains: A Viable Alternative for Sustainable Rural Development or Consolidation of Big Business?”. Eutopía, Revista De Desarrollo Y Territorio, no. 2 (November), 115-34. https://doi.org/10.17141/eutopia.2.2010.1032.